• Users Online: 883
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 

 Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2020  |  Volume : 5  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 433-438

Access-site complications after peripheral vascular interventions in patients with peripheral arterial disease at Assiut University Hospital


Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt

Date of Submission11-Jan-2020
Date of Decision27-Feb-2020
Date of Acceptance06-Mar-2020
Date of Web Publication20-Nov-2020

Correspondence Address:
Ahmed M Nageeb
Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut
Egypt
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/JCMRP.JCMRP_8_20

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 


Aim
The aim was to describe the incidence of access-site complications (ASCs) and determine the risk factors leading to them in patients undergoing endovascular interventions for treatment of peripheral arterial disease.
Materials and methods
A prospective study was conducted on all patients who underwent endovascular procedures for the treatment of peripheral arterial disease at the Department Vascular Surgery, Assiut University Hospital, between May 2017 and May 2018. Access choice depended on the vessel condition, Duplex ultrasound examination, and surgeon's preference. ASCs were detected using clinical and duplex ultrasound examination. Follow-up of patients was done at 3 and 6 months postoperatively. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to determine risk factors predicting occurrence of ASCs.
Results
Of the 210 patients, ASCs were encountered in 23 (11%) cases. Nine (4.3%) patients presented with thrombosis of the access artery, eight (3.8%) had access-site hematoma, four (1.9%) complained of external bleeding, and two patients (0.95%) presented with femoral artery pseudoaneurysm. Significant risk factors for ASCs were advanced age (P=0.027), hypertension (P=0.011), increased BMI (P=0.015), small vessel diameter (P=0.031), and prolonged procedure time (P<0.0001). BMI and procedure time were found to be predictors of occurrence of ASCs.
Conclusion
Long procedure time and increased BMI were found to be predictive of the occurrence of ASCs. Early detection and management of ASCs provide good outcome after 6-month follow-up.

Keywords: Access-site complications, peripheral arterial diseases, peripheral vascular interventions


How to cite this article:
Khalil MS, Hassan HA, I. Aboloyoun HE, Nageeb AM. Access-site complications after peripheral vascular interventions in patients with peripheral arterial disease at Assiut University Hospital. J Curr Med Res Pract 2020;5:433-8

How to cite this URL:
Khalil MS, Hassan HA, I. Aboloyoun HE, Nageeb AM. Access-site complications after peripheral vascular interventions in patients with peripheral arterial disease at Assiut University Hospital. J Curr Med Res Pract [serial online] 2020 [cited 2020 Dec 1];5:433-8. Available from: http://www.jcmrp.eg.net/text.asp?2020/5/4/433/301054




  Introduction Top


Access-site complications (ASCs) are a major cause of perioperative morbidity and mortality among patients undergoing percutaneous endovascular intervention. They include clinically significant bleeding, hematomas, and pseudoaneurysm (PSA)[1].

The effects of ASCs include not only prolonged hospital stay and patient discomfort but also increased mortality rates even at one year after the procedure. Even with external anatomic or fluoroscopic landmarks to guide the arterial access, the optimal location of femoral puncture is missed in 13% of cases[2].

High punctures may result in retroperitoneal hematomas while, low punctures can lead to PSAs. Some procedural factors that predict higher rates of ASCs are antegrade versus retrograde approach and interventional rather than diagnostic procedures[3]

Previous studies have shown that manual compression was significantly associated with ASCs, so duplex ultrasonography is preferred to assess the vascular access site after arterial puncture[4].


  Aim Top


The aim was to describe the incidence of ASCs and determine the risk factors leading to ASCs in patients undergoing endovascular interventions for peripheral arterial disease (PAD) at the Department of Vascular Surgery in Assiut University Hospital.


  Materials and Methods Top


This prospective descriptive study was conducted between May 2017 and May 2018 on 210 patients, comprising 161 (76.7%) males and 49 (23.3%) females, with a mean age of 62.0 ± 9.5 years, at the Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Department, Assiut University Hospitals. All patients underwent endovascular procedures for the treatment of lower extremity PAD were included.

Patients who underwent endovascular procedures for other indications such as endovascular abdominal aortic repair and embolization were excluded.

History of the current presenting symptoms; relevant medical and surgical history; review of cardiac, pulmonary, renal, hepatic, and hematologic systems; and history of allergies and current medications were obtained. Moreover, the location of prior arterial bypass grafts or stents, risk factors for contrast material reaction, contrast-induced nephropathy, and complications from previous endovascular procedures were identified.

Physical examination and investigations

Physical examination was performed to select the access artery and to exclude any contraindications for the arterial access such as groin infection, common femoral artery aneurysm, overlying hernia, and fresh incision over the access artery. All arterial pulses and symptoms and signs of PAD were evaluated.

The planned access site was interrogated using a color duplex ultrasound examination (Philips Envisor C and PhilipsHD5; Philips Medical System, The Nederland B.V.) with L 12-3-MHz linear transducer probe to determine access artery size, peak systolic velocity, and presence of calcification and/or proximal or distal arterial diseases.

All patients underwent routine laboratory investigations with the main focus on renal function and coagulation status.

Procedure

Regarding anesthesia, at the beginning of the procedure, 1 or 2% lidocaine hydrochloride was used for local infiltration anesthesia.

Regarding obtaining a vascular access, in general, arterial access was guided by palpation of the arterial pulse, or under fluoroscopy or duplex guidance. Often times, the operator used a combination of one or more of those methods to determine a proper puncture site. Surgical cut down of access artery was also used in some cases.

The arterial puncture was done using an 18 G needle (or 21 G needle in case of micropuncture access). After visualization of blood jets, a 0.035” short-wire (0.018” short-wire in case of micropuncture) was advanced. At this point, fluoroscopy was performed, and the location of the wire was identified within the intended vessel.

Once the wire was successfully placed in the intended vessel, a vascular sheath could be advanced after a small dermatotomy.

Regarding performing the planned angioplasty procedure, after obtaining a vascular access, the intended angioplasty procedure was performed.

Regarding postprocedural care, in general, a manual compression at the puncture site for 15–20 min was done to achieve hemostasis for smaller bore vascular sheaths up to 6 F. Patients were instructed for immobilization for at least 6 h.

Patients were monitored for arterial access-related complications by physical examination and duplex ultrasonography the next day after the procedure.

ASCs were managed according to the type of complications, time of presentation, patients' symptoms, available resources, and surgeon's preference.

Statistical analysis

Data entry and analysis was done using SPSS version 20 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA). Data were presented as mean ± SD. P value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

To identify risk factors, univariate and multivariate analysis was conducted using patient demographics (age and sex), comorbidities (smoking, BMI, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, ischemic heart disease, chronic kidney disease, and previous stroke), and angioplasty procedure and access-site characteristics (diameter of access artery, access site location, and access site guidance, calcification at access site and procedure time).

The study was approved and monitored by the Medical Ethics Committee, Assiut Faculty of Medicine (IRB: 17100945).

All patients signed an informed consent form.


  Results Top


This prospective study included 210 patients, comprising 161 (76.7%) males and 49 (23.3%) females, with a mean age of 62.0 ± 9.5 years (range: 30–86 years; median: 65 years). Patient characteristics data are listed in [Table 1].
Table 1: Demographic data

Click here to view


Tissue loss was the main indication for the angioplasty procedures (68.1%). The contralateral femoral artery was the most used access site (39.5%).

Other access site characteristics are summarized in [Table 2].
Table 2: Angioplasty procedure and access-site characteristics

Click here to view


Of all the patients included in this study, ASCs were encountered in 23 (11%) patients.

Nine (4.3%) patients were complicated with thrombosis of the access artery leading to acute limb ischemia. All of them were successfully treated with surgical thrombectomy using Fogarty thrombectomy catheters.

Eight (3.8%) patients had access-site hematoma that was treated conservatively with compression of the access site and follow-up duplex ultrasonography examination.

Four (1.9%) patients complained of external bleeding that was controlled by compression at the access site and stabilization of patients' hemodynamics. However, one patient died owing to irreversible hemorrhagic shock.

Two (0.95%) patients presented with femoral artery pseudoaneurysm. One was treated with duplex-guided compression therapy, whereas the other needed surgical intervention and suture repair of the puncture site [Figure 1].
Figure 1: Access-site complication rate stratified by the complication type.

Click here to view


Univariate analysis of demographics, procedure, and access-site data demonstrated that advanced age (P = 0.27), hypertension (P = 0.011), increased BMI (P = 0.015), small vessel diameter (P = 0.031), and prolonged procedure time (P < 0.0001) were the significant predictors of ASCs [Table 3], [Table 4] However, analysis of these data using a multivariate logistic regression model revealed that increased BMI (P = 0.011) and prolonged procedure time (P = 0.004) are the only significant independent predictors of ASCs.
Table 3: Univariate analysis of possible predictors of access-site complications

Click here to view
Table 4: Multivariate analysis of possible predictors of access-site complications

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


Recent advances in peripheral vascular intervention (PVI) have improved safety and vessel patency, and consequently increased the popularity of percutaneous endovascular treatment modalities for peripheral artery disease over the traditional open surgical approaches that can be associated with higher morbidity rates[6].

Since 1995, there has been a 10-fold growth in the rate of PVI and a simultaneous decrease in surgical vascular interventions[7].

The data on the incidence of and risk factors for ASCs among patients undergoing lower extremity revascularization are relatively sparse, relative to patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention[1].

We studied 210 patients (77% of patients were males) with PAD, with a mean age of 62.0 ± 9.5 years.

The overall rate of ASCs was 11%. In similar studies, Hackl et al.[8], Siracuse et al.[9], and Bakshi et al.[10] reported complication rates of 11.5, 11.7, and 14%, respectively. In other studies, ASCs including hematoma (with or without pseudoaneurysm) were the most frequent PVI complication, occurring in 1–11% of procedures[11].

On the contrary, Ortiz et al.[12], Lo et al.[13], and Mehta et al.[14] reported complication rates of 3.5, 5.4, and 2.4%, respectively.

In this study, hypertension was a significant predictor for ASCs (P = 0.011). This comes in accordance with Gerald et al.[8], who identified a high blood pressure more than 200 mmHg as a strong predictor for the development of puncture-site complications.

Advanced age was a significant predictor for ASCs (P = 0.027). Moreover, Ortiz et al.[12] and Jeffrey et al.[15] reported that age more than 60 and 80 years, respectively, were significant risk factors for ASCs.

Moreover, patients with increased BMI were at a higher risk for ASCs (P = 0.015). In contrast Ortiz et al.[12] reported higher rates of ASCs in patients with a BMI of less than 18.5.

In this study, the type of access-site guidance was not a predictor of ASCs. However, Kalish et al.[16] and Lo et al.[1] concluded that using duplex ultrasound was protective against ASCs. Moreover, Kret et al.[17] identified that ASCs were less frequent after arterial cut down (4.1%) compared with duplex-guided (11.8%) or fluoroscopy-guided access (7.3%).

Prolonged procedure time was associated with a higher risk of ASCs (P < 0.0001). This comes in line with Ortiz and colleagues who reported that prolonged time more than 30 min was a predictor for ASCs.

In contrast to the finding reported by Lo et al.[1], IHD was not a predictor of ASCs in the present study.

In this study, diabetes was not found to be a significant risk factor for ASC, in contrast to the findings reported by Darling et al.[18] and Ortiz et al.[19], who concluded that diabetes was a predictor for ASCs during and after PVI.

In our study, the type of access was not a significant predictor for ASCs which contradicts the finding reported by Siracuse et al.[9]. Antegrade ipsilateral access is safe and is not associated with increased ASCs. This approach remains a viable alternative to traditional retrograde contralateral access when it is more feasible[20].

All pedal access sites were patent by duplex ultrasound examination; retrograde trans pedal access was found nonsignificant for ASCs development. This is in line with Patel et al.[21], Stern et al.[22], and Bazan et al.[23].

Moreover, we encountered that the size of access artery was a predictor of ASCs with small vessel diameters less than 6 mm (P = 0.031).

In this study, we found cerebrovascular stroke, previous access of the same site, and location of arterial lesion in relation to access site to be non-significant for ASCs development.

Renal impairment was not significant for ASC in the present study, although Kret et al.[17] have found a higher rate of ASCs in patients with renal failure.

In our study, calcification of access artery was not significant for ASCs, in contrast to Stone et al.[24] who found calcification of access artery to be a predictor for ASCs.

In our study, eight (3.8%) patients were complicated by access site hematoma, keeping with corresponding rates reported by Siracuse et al.[9] (2.7%) and Komshian et al.[25](3.1%).

Our 1.9% (four of patients) rate of access site hemorrhage compares favorably with the 5.6% rate reported by Madden et al.[26].

In this study, we identified two (0.96%) patients complicated with PSA which comes in agreement with rates reported by Mehta et al.[14] (0.6%) and Siracuse et al.[9] (1.3%). Higher rate were also reported by Stone et al.[24](2.3%) and Kassem et al.[27] (3.42%). Very high rates reaching up to 32% for postpercutaneous intervention were also reported by Masterson et al.[28], during femoral artery screening with duplex ultrasound.

Nine (4.3%) of patients in the present study were complicated with thrombosis of the access artery, with similar corresponding rates reported by Madden et al.[26] (4.6%). Considerably lower rates for access artery thrombosis (0.6%) were also reported by Mehta et al.[14].


  Conclusion Top


ASCs occur after peripheral vascular interventions in patients with PAD. Individual risk level for ASCs in patients undergoing peripheral vascular intervention may be predicted.

Of all the patients included in this study, ASCs were encountered in 23 (11%) patients; nine (4.3%) patients presented with thrombosis of the access artery, eight (3.8%) patients had access site hematoma, four (1.9%) patients complained of external bleeding, and two (0.95%) patients presented with femoral artery pseudoaneurysm.

Early detection, proper management, and meticulous follow-up of ASCs provide better outcome after peripheral vascular interventions in patients with PAD.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Lo RC, Fokkema MT, Curran T, Darling J, Hamdan AD, Wyers M, et al. Routine use of ultrasound-guided access reduces access site-related complications after lower extremity percutaneous revascularization. J Vasc Surg 2015; 61:405–412.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Exaire JE, Tcheng JE, Kereiakes DJ, Kleiman NS, Applegate RJ, Moliterno DJ. Closure devices and vascular complications among percutaneous coronary intervention patients receiving enoxaparin, glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, and clopidogrel. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2005; 64:369–372.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Wheatley BJ, Mansour MA, Grossman PM, Munir K, Cali RF, Gorsuch JM, et al. Complication rates for percutaneous lower extremity arterial antegrade access. Arch Surg 2011; 146:432–435.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Helvie MA, Rubin JM, Silver TM, Kresowik TF. The distinction between femoral artery pseudoaneurysms and other causes of groin masses: value of duplex Doppler sonography. Am J Roentgenol 1988; 150:1177–1180.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Rutherford RB, Flanigan DP, Gupta SK, Johnston KW, Karmody A, Whittemore AD. Suggested standards for reports dealing with lower extremity ischemia. J Vasc Surg 1986; 4:80–94.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
White CJ, Gray WA Endovascular therapies for peripheral arterial disease: an evidence-based review. Circulation 2007; 116:2203–2215.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Anderson PL, Gelijns A, Moskowitz A, Arons R, Gupta L, Weinberg A, et al. Understanding trends in inpatient surgical volume: vascular interventions, 1980–2000. J Vasc Surg 2004; 39:1200–1208.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Hackl G, Gary T, Belaj K, Hafner F, Eller P, Brodmann M. Risk factors for puncture site complications after endovascular procedures in patients with peripheral arterial disease. Vasc Endovasc Surg 2015; 49:160–165.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Siracuse JJ, Gill HL, Cassidy SP, Messina MD, Catz D, Egorova N, et al. Endovascular treatment of lesions in the below-knee popliteal artery. J Vasc Surg 2014; 60:356–361.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Bakshi SC, Fobare A, Benarroch-Gampel J, Teodorescu V, Rajani RR. Lower socioeconomic status is associated with groin wound complications after revascularization for peripheral artery disease. Ann Vasc Surg 2020; 62:76–82.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Shammas NW, Shammas GA, Jerin M, Dippel EJ, Shammas AN. In-hospital safety and effectiveness of bivalirudin in percutaneous peripheral interventions: data from a real-world registry. J Endovasc Ther 2010; 17:31–36.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Ortiz D, Jahangir A, Singh M, Allaqaband S, Bajwa TK, Mewissen MW. Access site complications after peripheral vascular interventions: incidence, predictors, and outcomes. Circulation 2014; 7:821–828.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Lo R, Fokkema M, Curran T, Guzman R, Hamdan A, Wyers M, et al. Predictors of access-site-related complications after lower extremity percutaneous revascularization. J Vasc Surg 2013; 58:856–857.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Mehta M, Zhou Y, Paty PS, Teymouri M, Jafree K, Bakhtawar H, et al. Percutaneous common femoral artery interventions using angioplasty, atherectomy, and stenting. J Vasc Surg 2016; 64:369–379.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Kalish J, Eslami M, McPhee J, Healey C, Rybin D, Doros G, et al. Factors associated with femoral artery access site hematoma following peripheral vascular intervention. J Vasc Surg 2013; 58:856.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Kalish J, Eslami M, Gillespie D, Schermerhorn M, Rybin D, Doros G, et al. Vascular Study Group of New England. Routine use of ultrasound guidance in femoral arterial access for peripheral vascular intervention decreases groin hematoma rates. J Vasc Surg 2015; 61:1231–1238.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Kret MR, Dalman RL, Kalish J, Mell M. Arterial cutdown reduces complications after brachial access for peripheral vascular intervention. J Vasc Surg 2016; 64:149–154.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Darling JD, Bodewes TC, Deery SE, Guzman RJ, Wyers MC, Hamdan AD, et al. Outcomes after first-time lower extremity revascularization for chronic limb-threatening ischemia between patients with and without diabetes. J Vasc Surg 2018; 67:1159–1169.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Ortiz D, Singh M, Jahangir A, Allaqaband S, Gupta A, Bajwa T, et al. Development and validation of a preprocedural risk score to predict access site complications after peripheral vascular interventions based on the Vascular Quality Initiative database. J Patient Centered ResRev 2016; 3:20–29.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Siracuse JJ, Farber A, Cheng TW, Raulli SJ, Jones DW, Kalish JA, et al. Vascular Quality Initiative. Common femoral artery antegrade and retrograde approaches have similar access site complications. J Vasc Surg 2019; 69:1160–1166.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Patel A, Parikh R, Bertrand OF, Kwan TW. A novel patent hemostasis protocol-prevention of pseudoaneurysm after tibiopedal arterial access for evaluation and treatment of peripheral arterial disease. Cardiovasc Revasc Med 2019; 20:598–602.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Stern JR, Cafasso DE, Connolly PH, Ellozy SH, Schneider DB, Meltzer AJ. Safety and effectiveness of retrograde arterial access for endovascular treatment of critical limb ischemia. Ann Vasc Surg 2019; 55:131–137.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Bazan HA, Le L, Donovan M, Sidhom T, Smith TA, Sternbergh III WC. Retrograde pedal access for patients with critical limb ischemia. J Vasc Surg 2014; 60:375–382.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Stone PA, Campbell JE, AbuRahma AF. Femoral pseudoaneurysms after percutaneous access. J Vasc Surg 2014; 60:1359–1366.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Komshian S, Cheng TW, Farber A, Schermerhorn ML, Kalish JA, Rybin D, et al. Retrograde popliteal access to treat femoropopliteal artery occlusive disease. J Vasc Surg 2018; 68:161–167.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Madden NJ, Calligaro KD, Zheng H, Troutman DA, Dougherty MJ. Outcomes of brachial artery access for endovascular interventions. Ann Vasc Surg 2019; 56:81–86.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Kassem HH, Elmahdy MF, Ewis EB, Mahdy SG. Incidence and predictors of post-catheterization femoral artery pseudoaneurysms. Egypt Heart J 2013; 65:213–221.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Masterson LL, Corby T, Haurani M, Yu L, Starr J. Access site complications are commonly found on femoral artery duplex ultrasound and associated with age and manual pressure. J Vasc Surg 2014; 60:1100.  Back to cited text no. 28
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Aim
Materials and Me...
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
References
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed46    
    Printed4    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded7    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]