• Users Online: 677
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2020  |  Volume : 5  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 327-331

The use of GeneXpert Mycobacterium tuberculosis/rifampicin assay in diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in children


Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt

Correspondence Address:
Mohammed S Abdelwahab
Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut
Egypt
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/JCMRP.JCMRP_16_20

Rights and Permissions

Introduction Rapid diagno sis of tuberculosis (TB) is essential for early disease management. GeneXpert (GX) test is a novel rapid diagnostic modality. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the diagnostic role of GX test in diagnosing pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) in children as well as detection of rifampicin (RIF) resistance. Patients and methods This was a cross-sectional study that included 80 patients suspected to have PTB based on clinical data together with at least one of the followings: a positive tuberculin skin test or QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube test result, a positive blood TB PCR result, or a positive Ziehl–Neelsen staining result. Results PTB was more common in older females. Extrapulmonary manifestations and hilar lymphadenopathy were more frequent in younger age. Both positive tuberculin skin test and positive GX were more frequent in older age. Positive GX was found in 30 (37.5%) cases, and RIF resistance was detected in two (6.6%) of them. Positive GX results were more frequent in sputum than gastric aspirate samples. Positive GX results were more frequent with absent Bacillus Calmette–Guérin scar, and with hemoptysis, failure to thrive, cavitary lung lesions, and lower mean hemoglobin. Conclusion GX detects many more cases than blood PCR and Ziehl–Neelsen stain. GX had 70% sensitivity and 95% specificity in diagnosing PTB, with overall diagnostic accuracy of 86.67%, with better performance in older children who could expectorate. RIF resistance was ∼6.6%.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed243    
    Printed8    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded21    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal